InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 797
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/30/2013

Re: Going2Good post# 44243

Friday, 10/18/2013 10:17:22 PM

Friday, October 18, 2013 10:17:22 PM

Post# of 68424
I think we will and less of a 'hopium' comment. Why? well this is really the first time in this trial where I have seen (and perhaps correct me if i'm wrong) HJJ respond relatively effeciently to a very important motion.

I really think he finally has clued in to the fact that google has been gaming and has hung themselves.

While, as our JJ has mentioned, we don't want to assume he will hammer them now with a ruling suggesting further analysis of a w/a is moot, this actually seems like it might be the case.

If he had a view based on the evidence provided, that google did not obstruct or it was somehow his 'fault' for not providing enough details he would simply rule on the motion.

Giving google the chance to 'give their side' is clearly what he his doing here but it implies, combined with the above, that he like any sane man, cannot ignore Bartholomew's testimony.

That issue, Bart's testimony is what tells me google is cooked and we may very well see a final ruling very soon absent a settlement. I believe this meeting is more about warning google, settle now or else.

There is ZERO reason to be selling here and i am buying more monday.