* I found numerous typos & grammatical mistakes but was too late to post the edit, so here is the edited version.
==========================
Believe it or not, I agree, loosely, w/what your points are. It's more of a general principles kind of agreement, while at the same time, as I tried to find the right words to identify "the difference", recently, that I have with the concensus views, both pro & con.
1) obviously, any news from Co in any format cannot & should not violate NDA.
2) Even news that does not breach NDA, can be dicey to put out there, if not communicated in a delicate enough way (I'm not sure exactly what that entails..), so that it is not, nor could reasonably be construed as pumpage/dumpage (I realize that no matter what is said by whoever about whatever, it will be summarily twisted by those that do that, regularly...but that should not outweigh any major faith built, bolstered or maintained by some timely, buyout oriented news).
3) this is a special case, imho, which I recently also tried to point out, in that the company's history, and substantive value, has always been not good & zero, and continues to this day, outside of course, of the patents. The patents play, if it turns out to come to the big fruition everybody hopes for & expects, would be one of the most amazing set of moves I've ever seen made by a nothing company. In fact, almost too amazing...to the point where it bothers me...
To add to the uber unusual circumstances, it is so mind boggling, to try to quantitize the potential & real value of the patents, that so far, nobody, not even the company, has been able to truly put a real sort of value to it. This also worries me, as it is one of those too good to be true (sounding) scenarios.
Moreover, the apparent fact that this patent set, seems to portend a near (if not a total) control over what is cooking up to be (and all experts seem to agree) the already begun & already solidly entrenched, future of communications (that being voip, in its various forms) is hard to wrap a head around. How is a reasonable, both feet on the ground, person(s), supposed to be able to absorb or swallow such a fact, for company that a few short mos ago, was a big nothing with some shady past associations? Anybody who accepts it easily, is a fool, imho. But the acquisition & the patents & their subsequent approvals + the awesome BOD changes + the hiring of such a hi grade law firm... UNDOUTABLY changed EVERYTHING, and is really something to behold. All this considered (in the way most do on this board), I honestly cannot fathom how the price has stayed as low as it has....without factoring that there is similar & considerable doubt elsewhere, borne of the same kind of reasoning I offer here.
And to those who keep saying that it's due to still being mostly an unknown secret, I'm not buying it. I've seen enough reports of what vp has & why it's so good, along with all the pr's & white paper copies, distributed throughout the world, hitting enough key points & target audiences, for months on end, that it's known about allright.
All the above points are the basis for why a CC or a PR, that speaks directly to the shareholders, some level of confidence bolstering assurance, that the plan is still on course & continuing, in terms of positive ongoing negotiations. But I am still a relative newbie and lo on the totem, in terms of understanding big world finance, so I could be very wrong. It just seems to me, that within the scope of a totally honest & above board company, finding themselves in such a once in a lifetime position, that for them to just give a simple, non price pumping purposed, discrete assurance that it's "happening", would, at this point in time, go A LONG WAY.
Then again, I guess most are "dug in" enough at this juncture, that it all just comes down to holding your breath. As to new investors, and whatever effect on pps, the price is still so cheap & enough info freely available, that the veritable "silver platter" is there for the grab. Just advise to not risk too much is all I say.
I think above is good writing & for any scholarly person to say it's so bad it reveals an author where English is their second language & is likely composed via a translator, is very telling to me. (also a high school dropout).
