East,
The first comment was directed to a poster on RB that gave My02 a reprimand for helping me out because it indirectly responded to Tsheri. Who cares if it responds to Tsheri, if it is giving a concerned shareholder some information to help figure some of this out.
Thanks for your compliment but I am so inept at knowing how to find things! I often wish I could spend just one week with one of these co-investors who know how to do DD, look up people's history on the internet, and find and understand SEC documents and other information about companies. Man, would I go crazy once I could learn how they find this stuff and do it on my own!
The second comment was directed at probably 85% of the longs for NMKT (and many other stocks), and yes, did include you at times. I just do NOT want others to stop people from providing me with information even though they may not care to see that information.
I would not mind HELPING Augie, but I am VERY OPPOSED to deleting posts unless they are proven to be ILLEGAL, obscene, or so aggressive towards another poster that it would inhibit them from posting. And then, I feel a post needs to replace the deleted post explaining what was said and why it was illegal, saying it without obscenities, or tactfully rephrasing what they were saying to the other poster. I much rather address the bashers' concerns than ban them. They DO provide information that sometimes needs to be looked into and sometimes ends up being something about which shareholders may want to hold the directors' feet to the fire.
Oh, and I also agree with deleting PROVEN spam, but I have no problem with people sharing SOME info on other stocks that they are seeing might be a profitable trade/investment. You have been great at providing such information and I have greatly appreciated it.
