Hi Sidedraft,
Sorry I didn't get back sooner. I always trust you to "get to the source" and bring it on board. Hurthino has stolen the thunder. Mia Culpa.
Apologies for the "four years" comment. It was tongue-in-cheek. It was also jaded and cynical, as I have learned to mistrust the legal system, particularly, through my involvement in THIS case.
Your question as to who is leading this challenge through the courts. You have hit on my pet peeve for the duration of this matter in the courts.
Since there is a high degree of suspicion that the FDIC and JPM are colluding here to disenfranchise us, I am extremely leery of the next steps. Jones & Day, the lead reps against FDIC for 18 years(they did a marvelous job at that),is highly conflicted, as it has been a long time lead counsel to JPM. As long as WAMU was in charge of shepherding the Anchor case, there was no conflict, but, as soon as JPM took over WAMU the waters became very, very, very, murky.
I believe that the California group should have made a big point of this point ...but... here it is. We have a conflicted Attorney representing the self-dealing JPM, with an extremely vindictive (against the LTWs) FDIC. I smell big trouble ahead.
PS I hate the new layout here at Ihub.
AI
