There are many so called inventors out there who like to play pretend data geniuses or technologist's when really they are just trying to be the first to describe a pre-2000 real world method (its called identifying available real estate) in context of computer systems, or networks (get my meaning?)
You can bet your boots there is going to be some big haggling with prior art for obviousness, validity, enforcement with the claims..
The status of who is guilty or innocent of patent infringement really matters not when litigating the claims....IMO.
I have yet to see a federal Judge order a preliminary injunction because of public interest, SO, just a defendant raising the issue of validity can cause a plaintiff mucho money and time. Did MMRF ask for a preliminary?
IMO, if the way data is transmitted has not changed, but the information has, or named like medical, legal, pets etc., whatever, your right back to just adding some features...(doesn't make a patent) Maybe Bell (from the grave) should file lawsuit for inventing modulation?
Why hasn't MMRF "product" made huge sales? Plenty of publicity, so where is the revenue from such a great product?????
Throwing around a funny quote that actually means the opposite will not help sales, maybe just the ego...
Time is on our side, tick tock, dilution, tick tock dilution, tick tock, dilution...
If anyone believes this post contains anything false, tortious or libelous, please point it out. I will promptly retract it and apologize or else explain why I believe you are wrong.