InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 498
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/04/2007

Re: None

Tuesday, 10/08/2013 10:23:08 AM

Tuesday, October 08, 2013 10:23:08 AM

Post# of 68424
My opinion is that this was all just a calculated risk from Goog lawyers. Past history suggested the mere ideal of a work around would have HJJ reduce the RR award. So they said they have a work around. Then when they get called to that carpet to produce the actual evidence, they didn't have it so they had to back track and cover their asses. The one thing that Goog hasn't done to date and these filings seem to back this assertion up is produce an actual Goog employee that was involved in the creation and implementation of the "New AdWords". If they did that, VRNG would indeed have them by the balls, because at that point it would be tell the truth or risk perjury. To us on this side it wreaks of a failed attempt to reduce the RR, nothing more. However they are in CYA mode now and risk getting sanctioned for it too, but the sanctions don't out weigh the benefit if this worked and reduced the RR. Hopefully the judge will see right through this and put this W/A issue behind us and get on to the final RR.