InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 2151
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/30/2004

Re: bbotcs post# 30699

Tuesday, 10/08/2013 12:19:46 AM

Tuesday, October 08, 2013 12:19:46 AM

Post# of 35743
bbotcs re GORO Costs and more

In 2012, they had many problems, including problems with water & ventilation in the mine, employees, excess dilution in the ore, causing a hit to the grades & CF, plus the already dismissed class action lawsuit.

2012, They still pulled off
increased production to 90,432 AuEq at only 773 tpd,
All-In Sustainable Costs/oz sold $ 994,
Total cash cost $547 per AuEq including the royalty,
net income $34mil
Paying a substantial dividend.

H1 2013 averaged 823tpd netting 42,999 AuEq (within guidance)
H2 should be significantly higher as they have most of the 1500tpd mill expansion done. Note: the mine capacity to feed the 1500tpd mill will be lagging but the run rate for the mill has been 1000tpd for awhile.

In short they spent 2012 and H1-2013 rehabbing the mine & production team (including mgt). They did this from cash flow, while paying the divy during a time of very low gold prices.

Cash position $30mil+ Q2, adding production consistently, tight share structure, no history of dilutive private placements, industry leading dividend and near lowest cash costs, large land position 100% owned & overflowing with high grade Silver & Gold for future expansion.

Whats not to like? GORO looking better and better the lower it gets. Hothchild reducing its position might create a better opportunity. Divy over 6% now.

Might take a couple quarters to see the results, but I'm Betting their about ready to turn things up production wise.

Checkmate28

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.