InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 765
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/12/2003

Re: tecate post# 69659

Monday, 01/16/2006 9:36:40 AM

Monday, January 16, 2006 9:36:40 AM

Post# of 97679
Kate, re: May Hang.. get it. Bios workarounds are common and you know it. Yawn.

A bios workaround that shuts off ALL of Speedstep will not make it wanted, especially by corporations. Without Speedstep, and considering the already extreme max power it will now need to function at constantly, it's virtually sure that Intel will hardly sell any significant volume of this first iteration of Presler.

Yes bios workarounds are very common as you noted, but this 'workaround' is so crude that it rather significantly devalues Presler, especially for corporations; so much that it wil be shunned by most especially by corporations but also by the knowledgeable consumers. This thermal Presler fluke probably will drive continued pressure on their 90nm fabs because Prescott will need to replace Presler is most cases. Both in server and desktop lines.

I think no Intel person actually said 'yawn' because of the consequences for sales - I frankly think most used the F-word instead. Even more importantly Intel's image is not exactly enhanced by the continuing string of P4- and Itanium related flukes.

Regards,

Rink






Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News