Friday, October 04, 2013 9:05:32 PM
Still here long and strong. I'm glad to see that the MIT1000 and the Bardot are pairing up for some research in an academic setting. They are very similar in the technology, the MIT1000 identifies single organisms and the Bardot uses the same forward scatter to identify colonies of bacteria, which is more complex and takes longer. That is a drawback of the Bardot . Luckily Dr. Haavig patented the process of identifying single organisms years before his alma mater Purdue developed their machine. What's interesting is that the Purdue dept. of food safety seems to be working on an algorithm for a non-exhaustive library using supervised learning of identification. Meaning that the machine learns as it goes to identify different sub-types of a particular bacterium. I haven't seen any material use of this yet though.I'm curious to see if Dr. Haavig will be involved in this since identifier algorithms are his forte as evidenced by previous work. We will have to wait and see.
North Bay Resources Announces Assays up to 5 oz/ton Gold, 1.5 oz/ton Platinum, 0.5 oz/ton Palladium, and 0.5 oz/ton Rhodium at Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Oct 4, 2024 9:15 AM
Basanite, Inc. Appoints Ali Manav as Interim Chief Executive Officer • BASA • Oct 3, 2024 9:15 AM
Integrated Ventures Announces Launch of MedWell Facilities, LLC and Lease Agreement with Giant Fitness Clubs • INTV • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
Beyond the Horizon: Innovative Drug Combinations Offer New Hope for Alzheimer's and More • NVS • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service To Enhance Natural Rubber Industry's Ability to Report on Sustainable and Ethical Supply Chains • SMX • Oct 3, 2024 7:00 AM
Transforming Alzheimer's Treatment: Innovative Combinations to Boost Cognition • PFE • Oct 2, 2024 9:00 AM