I've always had doubts about Frank's claims concerning the so-called AAA(universal compatibility). Not knowing anything about software coding and very little about computers makes this pure speculation on my part, but having a given database communicate with a certain other database would seem to me to require a certain amount of information specifically written for those 2 databases. Of course if enough information about all the availible databases is encoded into the product, then it might very well become universally compatible at some point. At any rate, the product doesn't appear to be universally compatible on the RDI site. They(RDI) do acknowledge the origins:
" The ACS was developed by ANTs Software, Inc. continuously since 2005 at a cost of over $85 million dollars."
Is it possible Ants collapsed(well...you know what I mean;), the exchanged note holders seized the technology and then put it in Franks hands in hopes of a fiscal return? What then, of the ADS? And why did it(ADS) disappear from the Ants website, leaving only the ACS?????? What exactly did Frank do to the product when he took the reins at Ants. Was it changed enough that he could be considered an owner? Then why give credit to Ants on the RDI site for the developement? These are questions we really need answered.
