InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 90
Posts 2337
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/21/2010

Re: None

Thursday, 10/03/2013 3:13:01 PM

Thursday, October 03, 2013 3:13:01 PM

Post# of 38473
Any day between now and what? The 15th? 16th? a whole lot of investors are going to be sorely disappointed with UBRG's 10k.

Why?

Because investors are pinning their hopes towards answers WHEN UBRG has a long history of NOT answering questions in their SEC filings.

Revenue? Sure...it'll be in there. It'll be bleak AND it won't reflect any of the GREAT DEALS Ali and Guest and NDR have issued PR's about after July 1.

Cost of revenue? Yup, it'll be in there and it will show that as revenues increased for the period ending June 30 so did their cost of revenue. It'll show increased SG&A and it will show net revenue losses.

What about EXACTLY who GEG IS? I mean, will it show who they are, which one they are, or give investors any clue ?
NO! They had a chance to identify which GEG it is in May...it's in their SEC filing an they only describe them as an affiliate and there is nothing stopping them from doing that again.

Will it answer Metwood or GEG questions? Not likely (caveat...unless it's a material transition during the current period BUT if that were the case then we would have seen an 8k sometime between June 30 and now.)

Some investors insist that there is a material reason for the FYE change and completely ignore the fact that if it were material to shareholders it has to be released. Ergo, NOTHING MATERIAL has occurred...unless you accept that something material has occurred and UBRG is unwilling or unable to properly file current events material to shareholders.
Either way, shareholders get hosed. Either something material did happen and UBRG robbed shareholders of a SEC filing which could have been a catalyst for stock price expansion OR nothing material has happened.
Pick your poison on that one.

All this wild speculation of reverse mergers, reverse acquisitions, alignment with a global force and etc. Simply cannot be supported because there is a absolute lack of documentation to support AND VIA FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITY IF THERE WERE SUCH ACTIONS IT MUST BE REPORTED.

I'm going to be interested in the share count. I believe the "share repurchase" was a simple transfer, between UBRG and Earnest Delong. But seeing as EVEN THAT OCCURRED AFTER the BRAND NEW FYE date we won't even get to see too much detail on that.

DOES ANYONE ELSE SEE, as I do, that ALL OF THIS MATERIAL SPECULATION coincidentally will be obfuscated simply by changing a Fiscal Year End? Do you not see that Ali and Guest are capable of mapping out a plan and figuring out a way to hide their shady deals for extended periods just by changing FYE?

NOT ONLY HAVE THESE SHADY DEALS occurred AFTER they changed FYE (which have them the leeway to NOT FILE Q2) but because almost all of it occurred after the FYE change it won't be on this 10k which MEANS that it'll possibly be held off until the BRAND NEW Q1 which will be 45 days from September 30, 2013 (plus up to 5 days due to a forecast-able NT filing ahead of the Q1 release.

All the FY change did was basically give Ali and Vinnie 6 months to hide, or blur details...


If I'm wrong... Why is all of Wall Street ignoring this stock...selling this stock?
Why?
If Wall Street saw this as a $0.01 stock you don't think they'd want a 500% return too?
What if they saw it as a $1.00 stock...or even better a $7.00 dollar stock as "some" investors claim it to be? Wouldn't they want 10,000% returns?

It's not...it's not even a $0.0018 stock. Ali and Guest are either frauds or they are the dumbest leaders of a company EVER IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD...you get to pick which one you think they are.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.