You do realise you actually have to read the article to make statements right? First part clearly states (check out bold tekst):
Indianapolis, Indiana -- Patent lawyers for GS CleanTech Corp. of Alpharetta, Georgia ("CleanTech") sued in the Northern District of Iowa alleging that Little Sioux Corn Processors, LLLP of Marcus, Iowa ("Little Sioux") had infringed METHOD OF PROCESSING ETHANOL BYPRODUCTS AND RELATED SUBSYSTEMS, Patent No. 7,601,858, and its family of related patents, which have been issued by the U.S. Patent Office. The case was transferred to the Southern District of Indiana as part of Multidistrict Litigation No. 2181.
So the case wasn't added it's been transferred from another district to be ruled over along with the other patent infringement cases that have also been transferred.
It got transferred from the District of Iowa Northern:
RFC Case Number: P-G13-8012L
Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-08012-LJM-DML
File Date: Tuesday, September 10, 2013
Plaintiff: GS Cleantech Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: Douglas L. Phillips of Klass Law Firm LLP
Michael J. Rye, Andrew C. Ryan of Cantor Colburn LLP
Defendant: Little Sioux Corn Processors, LLLP
Cause: 35:145 Patent Infringement
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Judge: Judge Larry J. McKinney
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch
Notes: Case transferred in from District of Iowa Northern; Case Number 5:13-cv-04065. Original file copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. (Entered: 09/10/2013)
This is the case:
CleanTech asserts that ICM sold products and equipment to Little Sioux that infringe one or more of the claims of the patents-in-suit. Little Sioux is accused of using these products and equipment to infringe one or more of the claims of the patents-in-suit. In the complaint, patent attorneys for CleanTech assert:
· Count I: Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,601,858
· Count II: Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,008,516
· Count III: Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,008,517
· Count IV: Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,283,484
CleanTech asks the court for preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting further infringement of the patents-in-suit; an award of damages adequate to compensate CleanTech for the infringement that has occurred, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the inventions of the patents-in-suit as provided in 35 U.S.C. § 284, together with prejudgment interest from the date the infringement began; and an award to CleanTech of all remedies available under 35 U.S.C. §§ 284, 285 and 154(d).
So yes it's happening NOW, did you see the transfer date? You're just pulling up smoke curtains, but I'm not buying into that bro, This is set to go to the finale.
