Thanks for the link. Do you have a link to the other critics of this trial?
Also, as I just posted to twitter, I do not understand how on earth did they came up with 35% after they state they assume HR=0.8. A 2:1 trial with 578 events with HR=0.8 is 75% powered. Did they just assume 50-50 after all the calculations? Very scientific.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.