Bebida Beverage Company (BBDA)

[chocherita]

This are the FACTS! that can NOT been ignored!Here is a resume of BBDA HISTORY SELLING SHARES SCAM DILUTION! and what ever they trying to sell is just and pure B.S.! BRAIN WEBER IS A CON ARTIST PROVED SCAMMER!HEY YOU GO PLZ. READ!!!!..


The passing of the shell and major dilution

Before being passed on to Brian Weber, the shell was briefly controlled by Rodrigo Makarios from September 2008 to April 2009. It was under Makarios that the business operations switched to a bottled water company called Bebida Beverage Company.

http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=VkvlBHbj9VJzL6Yfbd1VnQ%253d%253d&nt7=0

Between September 2008 and April of 2009, over 3,070,000,000 shares were issued towards Debt reduction.

On April 9th, 2009, Bebida Beverage Company was taken over by Brian Weber. Bebida Beverages was changed to the language friendly form of BeBevCo.

Later in December of 2009, the Bebida Beverage Company Nevada entity would merge with Brian Beverage Company which was a Wyoming business entity set up and controlled by Brian Weber back in November of 2008. The surviving entity would become Bebida Beverage Company, a Wyoming entity with Brian Weber as the CEO.

No filings whatsoever were done between October of 2008 and October of 2009 when Brian Weber filed an initial company disclosure and information form with the OTC on October 16, 2009 which has since been made inactive along with over 40 other OTC filings.

Between April of 2009 and September of 2009, another 2,725,000,000 shares were issued towards Debt reduction. By September 30, 2009 there were 6,394,877,549 outstanding shares.

By December 31, 2009 the outstanding share count had grown to 7,446,754,216.

By March 31, 2010 the outstanding share count had grown to 9,277,814,489.

By June 31, 2010 the outstanding share count had grown to 12,343,269,035.

Nearly all of those shares were issued toward debt Notes and for "capitalization" which is just another phrase for dilution.

BBDA raised the authorized common share count 4 times during the first 5 months of 2010.

Then on October 7, 2010, BBDA executed a 1:1000 reverse split.

The Legal Counsel during this time started out as Arthur Piervincenti then was changed to McMullen Associates, LLC. then in 2011 was changed to Harold Martin.

The Investor Relations role during this time went from Chris Hoffmann Jr. (C. Hoffmann Communications, Inc) to K. J. Crutchely (Kelbec Communications) to Jeffrey Staller (Heritage Corporate Services) to Wall Street Branding


------------


The Reverse Split and continued dilution

Sometime after Brian Weber took over the debt Notes once again began appearing in the name of Cornell Capital under their new alias, YA Global. Just going off of the information in the filings, the first mention of YA Global as a debt Note holder in place of K&L International Enterprises Inc doesn't appear to have happened until some time in early 2011 after the 1:1000 reverse split.

Following the 1:1000 Reverse split the outstanding share count was reduced to 12,330,925 and the authorized share count was reduced to 500,000,000.

Immediately following the 1:1000 reverse split 19,000,000 shares were issued towards executive deferred salary owed for 2009.

The debt Note conversion and capitalization picked right back up again. During the last quarter of 2010, 600,000 more shares were issued toward debt Notes owned by YA Global and 7,250,000 shares were issued for capitalization.

The outstanding share count grew from 40,680,926 on December 31, 2010 to 80,793,437 on March 31, 2011 then to 346,264,025 on June 30, 2011 then to 483,814,779 on September 30, 2011 then to 846,111,020 on December 31, 2011.

During the 4th quarter of 2011, the YA Global debt Notes were transferred to Redwood Management LLC.

All total in 2011 another 230,000,000 shares were issued towards debt Notes owned by YA Global/Redwood Management and another 510,000,000 shares were diluted for "capitalization".

The thing that confuses me most of all is that BBDA has claimed to be making a lot of money off of their product over the past two years, yet the company chose to dilute down the value of their stock hurting the investment value of its shareholders by issuing discounted free trading shares to debt Note holders and diluting shares into the market instead of paying off their debts with their profits. The whole thing seems very dirty and selfish to me.

The Authorized share count was raised to 1,000,000,000 in December of 2011 and then to 1,500,000,000 in January of 2012. The trend in the share price suggests that some dilution has continued since the New Year despite the company's claims that they have finally paid off all of their debt Notes.
Thoughts? Tia.