InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 28
Posts 344
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/23/2013

Re: TheProgressive post# 42248

Friday, 09/20/2013 5:14:29 PM

Friday, September 20, 2013 5:14:29 PM

Post# of 403766
TP - That is a really interesting find. I have been looking it over a bit but do not claim to fully comprehend what the addition to the original patent is all about. I offer these observations:
There were 48 claims in the original patent and this new document adds 20 claims. There seem to be an emphasis on "method of treating" for the first 11 new claims. Some of these are for items in the original patent that covered a "pharmaceutical composition" but did not do so for a "method of treating" from what I can tell. It is interesting that the original patent did get into the method to treat starting on claim #20 for compound #45 but did not do so for claims 1-19 which are all nested to refer back to claim #1 of the original which, in turn, are all based on compounds #36 through #44. The original patent also did not specify a method to treat starting with claim 37 for compound #53. Anyway, for what it is worth this may be an attempt to patent the method to treat for the compounds noted in claims 1-19 of the original patent.

Then we come to claims 12 through 20 in the new document where the emphasis switches from "method to treat" to "pharmaceutical compositions" and "compounds". I haven't looked at these too much vis a vis the old document. Maybe some new chemical compositions?

I am no expert but like to look at complex documents to keep the brain cells firing. I would be interested in anyone who has other observations regarding this important find by TP.