InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 70
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/18/2013

Re: JJSeabrook post# 43492

Friday, 09/20/2013 2:53:58 PM

Friday, September 20, 2013 2:53:58 PM

Post# of 68424
i've done my DD with VRNG for the longest time,
november trial,
Maureen blog,
virgina miss print of amount
all the re examination
but with 420 confirmed
now they want to see if its deemed related? I thought the trial said it was so why again and again, What happened to there workaround shouldn't they focus on that rather then the past? This tell me that they want the damages from trial to may workaround invalid cause it's not related but the trial again said it was related from trial date back, so why would it matter? Then they dont have to make up a workaround? Seems like a waste of time