InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 991
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/07/2013

Re: Spacen post# 14110

Thursday, 09/12/2013 2:36:53 PM

Thursday, September 12, 2013 2:36:53 PM

Post# of 46516
You're missing what I said at the end of the estimate. My estimates are very low. They include no other lawsuits and no P/E multiple. Also, I do not believe 2% or 3% to be in the equation. 5% and above is more likely in my opinion. I probably should have not included the 2% and 3% in my calculations. 5%-10% would be a more helpful calculation range. And a 2:1 P/E ration would double the lowest figure. Also, if Kidrin offers shareholders a one time dividend (which he said he might) upon a settlement or trial victory, scores of people aware of this will buy in to receive it. WDDD's CEO is no fan of day-traders and has no interest in looking out for them. He is interested in long-term shareholders who stick with the company through the litigation. If a one-time dividend is to be given to shareholders, I suspect the CEO will just come out and announce that all current shareholders as of the announcement will receive the dividend. If this is possible to do, I guess he might do it. And this alone will draw people in ahead of time rather than risk being caught without shares (but this last thought is pure speculation on my part, only an opinion).

Willfulness does not mean the judge has to grant treble damages, but means the judge can grant treble damages. If the damages are not trebled, my guess is the royalty rates will be significantly higher, maybe even as high as 10%.

My estimates are way too low by themselves, but if you know the whole story, they lay the groundwork upon which multiples and investor interest can stack many more dollars/share.