InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 444
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/01/2013

Re: rokkdatstock post# 31295

Wednesday, 09/11/2013 6:40:39 PM

Wednesday, September 11, 2013 6:40:39 PM

Post# of 44232
I did not say "all" medical alarm users, I said a "significant majority" of medical alarm users. There is a very big difference.

You are correct that there is a portion of the medical alarm cuntomers who want or need the mobile capability. That percentage is growing. But it is still only a small % of the overall number of people that need the protection.

And the cellular coverage has not been available through the major providers for a long time. During my research I came along a medical alarm review site that had a full article that I thing was from early 2013 but might have been from the end of 2012 about how the next step would need to be cellular coverage. I will have try to find it again. but it verified my point about the "significant majority" of medical alarm users having assistance when out of the house. The main reason for the need to expand into cellular coverage was because so many "baby boomers" don't have land lines any more and either didn't mention or barely mentioned the need for added coverage for those that are more mobile.

By the way, some of the competition that are reasonably well known with decent market share still requires an actual land line and are not compatible cable provided VOIP, Magic Jack, or Vonage
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent WHSI News