MWM is right, at least this most recent study was fully independent and they had no possible ulterior motives or incentives that would impact their conclusions...which in this case, was quite damming about Anatabloc.
I can't say the same thing about the studies you just posted. They were all conducted by the Roskamp Institute. STSI has a royalty agreement with an “affiliate” of the Roskamp Institute. STSI pays royalties of 5 percent — $301,000 in 2012 —– of its Anatabloc sales to the affiliate.
In addition, in 2010 and 2011, Robert G. Roskamp, the founder of the Roskamp Institute, bought thousands of shares of Star Scientific’s common stock.
Sooooo, it would seem that the study that was just released would be most reliable for someone trying to make an informed decision fully free from any hints of bias.
And by the way, MWM asked a great question. Why isn't news of this most recent study pinned at the top of the board? You guys have been waiting many months for results from an independent study and when you finally get it, you try to run from it. Keep the board honest and please pin the news.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
