![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Monday, January 09, 2006 10:30:17 AM
it doesn't make sense for MMs to cover during the reverse split...since most pinkies are scams anyways, MMs very rarely cover. The day the R/S was announced IGTN was removed from the Reg SHO list...why would the MMs have covered if it wasn't necessary?
Ingen may have a product, but as of yet they are still ridiculously in debt and don't have much of a future without some takers...
IMO
"A one that is not cold is scarcely a one at all" --Strongbad
FEATURED Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM