Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

Possibly read your post wrong but I think more likely you read mine wrong.. 1st thing I said was to welcome your opinion (because you had said someth to the effect of: "... If you want my opinion..". 2ndly, I fully agreed with & helped validate your comment about the political aspect, by saying that it's an ever present & unfortunate "nature of the beast". Next, I separated the political from the legal because the legal aspect I spoke to was in terms of the much discussed here points about the possibility or futility of long court battles over patent infringement, that, as opposed to any political back scratching or quid pro quo isms. What I was trying to add to that element, was the idea that if the legal aspect of patent infringement was strongly in favor of vp, then that needed to be confirmed for sure by the legal minds around here, because it's a super important aspect, at this stage & development of vp. So I can't see where a single word I said was in opposition to yours & more importantly nothing even remotely questioning your knowledge of any judge stuff (which you clearly sound on the defensive about). All that said, I can't help but add that being the grandson of a judge does not automatically allow anyone to have deep insight into the inner workings. It sure sounds like that's what you claimed. Still, I was mainly in agreement. Sorry if any words I chose somehow impuned your your knowledge. No intent.