I've been saying it all along. Leverage and negotiation, red herring.
yet here we are debating the same issue 3x times now, and every time the shorts jump on it to support their views and every time the stock drops lol.
i actually like this, i buy more leaps cheap, by more shares cheap. etc etc.
i know enough law, alot of tech a ton of finance and have no qualms with my position.
i find it odd that the shorts have never been able to answer questions such as yours jj, fundamental challenges to their position but instead they slander, bark etc.
other points related to that.
1. What company in their right mind risks 100's of billions for 1 billion or less? None in their right mind, and clearly google has not implemented anything.
2. Why would they ask for an absurd, and embarrasingy idiotic review of a patent that has already been upheld and included the referenced precedent in the analysis/review if they had a valid workaround(s) that they have been claiming since august of last year.
3. If they had one since august of last year, how is it possible that they went through a trial? lol
4. How is it possible to design, code, test, debug, test again, beta test, bug fix, test, deploy mission critical, fundamental core systems in 6 months, this is their ENTIRE BUSINESS MODEL lol..not some bolt on piece of software and its the process not the code! lol...i worked in software, its impossible and most techies will tell you the same.
5. All of this and we're still debating the same stupid issue. lol. its not there and never was. it was leverage.
6. only piece of leverage google has left is time. they are trying to drive vrng crazy and their delays are simply their way of saying, we'll run this through the ringer unless you take less. all about negotiation tactics and positioning.
7. no appeal strategy that benefits them economically, going to appeals can only hurt google financially, no w/a. lol
same place we were 10 days ago just people with ptsd like to panic.
i added today, thanks shorts
