XpresSpa Group Inc (XSPA)

[JJSeabrook]

The judge did not rule on laches? Yes, in fact, he did. Did he reverse his ruling he made? No, he did not. What do you mean he did not rule on laches? VRNG fans don't agree with it, but that's a point that is on appeal.

The judge did not rule on jury error? Yes, he did. He let their verdict stand. That is a ruling, and another point of appeal.

The judge will not rule on a running royalty? Yes, he will. You can bank on that, unless there is a settlement.

"At some point Vrng will accept this state of afffairs and be forced to settle more so on Goog's terms, because if they don't the case moves closer to the federal court wherein there may not be terms?????" Uh, we ARE in Federal Court. Wherein there may not be terms? Don't know what that means, and probably wasn't meant to.

GL

JJ

Black Hills Member Profile Black Hills

Tuesday, August 27, 2013 2:29:10 PM
Re: Mirk_Water post# 42236
Post # of 42256
This case is nothing but politics and power. The judge did not rule on laches, nor on jury error and will not rule on a running royalty (interim interest is just a tiddlywinks sideshow). At some point Vrng will accept this state of afffairs and be forced to settle more so on Goog's terms, because if they don't the case moves closer to the federal court wherein there may not be terms.

After this is all over, our republic will still be intact and the only damage will be to some longs (like me) and insiders, as we are insignificant to the political influence of Goog and how it must be protected (against so called trolls) and preserved for the future election cycles.

The longs have been given their chance to record small gains and maybe there will be a few more or so this fall, I'm afraid there is no hog slaughtering here when the hog is named Goog.