InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 3671
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/23/2011

Re: pastorboy post# 10955

Tuesday, 08/27/2013 10:34:37 AM

Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:34:37 AM

Post# of 12573
Thx for clarification PB. There was so much running with the ball type speculation, and implication this was from the I told you so horse's mouth . . .
Did you notice that the new NI 43-101 again lowered the cutoff grade for the underground estimate (from 2.0 to 1.7 g/t - in itself if all holes remained the same would account for a 17.65% increase). The prior estimate at 1.7 totaled 1,152,868 oz all underground with majority inferred. However the big change I pick up on is that the modeling method was changed from inverse cubed interpolation to the much less conservative "Ordinary Kriging" but with offsetting impact from reduction of model composite blocking to 1.5m composites within a 5m long x 2.5m wide x 5m high block model. from 1m composites within a 10mlong x 5m wide x 5m high block model

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.