InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 70
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/18/2013

Re: JJSeabrook post# 42109

Monday, 08/26/2013 11:39:49 PM

Monday, August 26, 2013 11:39:49 PM

Post# of 68424
Thanks JJ, i agree that sup damages should be ruled on as 3.5% of 20.9% which would be about 130 Million increase to google's sup damages amount, not going forward the Running roy rate I see will go one of two ways:

1) workaround is true and proven which would end damages going forward and the judge will probably rule a 3.5% thank you and good night or:

2) workaround is a colorful variation and Judges says sorry you wasted my time so 5-7% for Vrng going forward.

So the workaround is the driving factor. did Google send it off as a sealed doc? Do we know yet or is that hard to see? I would have thought we got a compliance doc about it on Pacer.

Crazy night , i'm in AZ so i don't have to burn the midnight oil like others.

The Saga continues ...