InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 298
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/05/2013

Re: steve accountant post# 21077

Monday, 08/26/2013 8:08:00 PM

Monday, August 26, 2013 8:08:00 PM

Post# of 28686
And what was the square footage of that building? And how much square footage of space would normally be required for each furnace and work/processing area? I'm curious to hear how you are qualifying "huge" in this case, steve accountant. The assumption at the time may also have been (quite likely, in fact) that they were going to add more equipment on an as-needed basis, so they would want enough space to grow into without having to find larger space too soon. An entirely logical supposition for anyone even remotely acquainted with how to run a business.

The "besides to fool investors" part sounds like pure unfounded speculation to me, and unlikely to have been the intent when the building was first chosen. I would like to see documentation to support such a claim, though undoubtedly none exists given the unlikelihood of the claim.


steve accountant wrote:

Yes, BORK is spending more responsibly.

BORK got rid of their old useless building because they didn't make much of anything and got a rented post office box at the UPS store so that BORK can be notified when they have lawsuits against them.

Besides to fool investors, BORK never needed such a huge building for a couple of cheap tiny furnaces to produce 12 or something vests. LOL!!