InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,870.62
(
-1.32%
)
US TECH 100
19,880.00
(
-2.30%
)
Dow Jones
43,444.99
(
-0.70%
)
Brent Oil
71.18
(
0.66%
)
Bitcoin
90,571.27
(
0.78%
)
Post# of 2595
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

wshaw14

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 104
Posts 16807
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 12/07/2005

wshaw14

Re: bhumiartha post# 944

Sunday, 08/25/2013 5:07:19 PM

Sunday, August 25, 2013 5:07:19 PM

Post# of 2595
Yes, one down and one to go. Though that was a weak case, it was the stronger of the two. The other can be pretty much summed up as:

IGM was a minority shareholder. (The key word here is "minority")

IGM claims the value of the assets sold was far in excess of the value paid for those assets.

Even in business, the majority does still rule.

http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=58929140
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up