InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,626.02
(
0.54%
)
US TECH 100
18,986.40
(
0.30%
)
Dow Jones
41,393.78
(
0.72%
)
Brent Oil
71.83
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
59,760.38
(
-1.35%
)
Post# of 91007
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

TheSkunk

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 20
Posts 959
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/08/2013

TheSkunk

Re: SitFly post# 20465

Friday, 08/23/2013 5:36:15 PM

Friday, August 23, 2013 5:36:15 PM

Post# of 91007
I have a theory on the BOD.

They are there in name only.

Does anyone think if Hershman were actually engaged as a board member with his compliance credentials that we'd be in this situation to begin with?

If he were engaged he'd be bird-dogging the compilation of the delayed SEC filings and make that job one from a compliance stand point to get done.

As has been pointed out previously by others, none of the board members have any "skin in this game" so it's not hard to come to a conclusion that they aren't doing a whole heckuva lot.

With all the shareholders here, we should form an investment group which, if we held enough shares, could get one of us seated as a board member! How 'bout them apples?!?!?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up