I found the phrasing odd, too. But as you know, they've frequently messed up filings by using templates and forgetting to take out irrelevant stuff...
I suppose they might have removed Radcliffe from the board. If so, why? Of course, normally an explanation would be required. But this is not a "normal" company.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.