InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 107
Posts 11954
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/06/2007

Re: tangerine post# 61802

Thursday, 08/22/2013 12:04:22 AM

Thursday, August 22, 2013 12:04:22 AM

Post# of 75926
Logic? There is no "claim" that there has been dilution, there is FACT that there has been ongoing dilution. Unless you are saying that the Transfer Agent is lying to shareholders and giving false share count numbers out. Just because the shares haven't been sold yet, doesn't mean there was no dilution and doesn't mean that the dilution doesn't weaken all shareholder value. Especially dilution on the scale that SNDY has put forth.

You can't sell your dilution shares if there is no one buying them unless you just want to dump them at the bid. Watch what happens if and when another PR comes out. Just like the last short lived "run" from .0028 to .0038 and then the immediate drop back down. Over a hundred million shares were traded and the stock only managed a spike of .001, and then quickly tanked back down to the .002's again. Why do you think that happened? Why didn't that kind of volume send the stock into the stratosphere? After all, just today peeps were marveling about how the stock was "up 14%" on very low volume. It was the effects of DILUTION that killed that short lived rally to .0038 dead in its tracks. There were buyers and sellers and DILUTION won the day with the sellers getting out before the buying dried up.

It is a misconception to believe that just because shares that are issued by the company are not immediately sold the same day they are issued, there has not been any dilution. Regardless of whether they are immediately sold or not, dilution still weakens overall shareholder value. That is not only the "logical" conclusion, it is the factual conclusion.