Why is nobody questioning the actions of BRND
How does this benefit Andreas at all?
1. He said he doesn't and never has owned BRND stock (same with Dennis)
2. BRND did NOT make BBV more popular. Only little b1tches think that. Dennis made the vodka popular (hence everyone wanting Dennis to tweet more just weeks ago, I am talking everyone at this board). Dennis also made this stock popular because it was at the time associated with BBV. Again Dennis made BBV popular, not the same 50-100 people posting on Ihub. The general public doesn't even know the company nor do they care who makes or distributes the vodka.
How does this benefit BRND?
1. They all own shares
2. They could have easily diluted at any time (not saying they have, but nobody knows)
Big benefits for BRND and NO benefits for Andreas. Again you can rip on Andreas all you want but 90% of the posts I am reading are straight up BS because people are pissed they lost money. Heck one of the stickies is straight up BS - It says BadBoyVodka.com has BRND contact info, but the truth is BBV website redirects to AB corporate website and has for awhile (someone needs to clear cookies and cache)
Not to mention we have actually heard from Andreas about this issue while nobody can even get in contact with BRND, no PR, no nothing. Yet nobody finds the actions of BRND fishy?
Someone earlier also mentioned that Andreas did the all this on the 18th because he was mad at BRND, again another false statement. On twitter he mentions this on the 16th.
AI
