InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 1141
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/11/2012

Re: Recentiy03 post# 41186

Sunday, 08/18/2013 12:46:00 PM

Sunday, August 18, 2013 12:46:00 PM

Post# of 68424
Not really. All they said was the swear they "believe" their new system does not infringe. This is not the same as guaranteeing it does not since there is no independent verification and they are not really publicly disclosing how this new system works are they? Also, I have stated this before. If they really had a new system they would have been working on it for a long time and the most opportune moment to disclose it would have been at trial. It would have been game.set match.. no money case closed. You don't find it curious that they say to the court, considering all their stalling tactics that they now "think" they have something? Read their words carefully, they were selected to avoid legal problems. Finally, both Larry Ellison and the late Steve Jobs state that Google steals code as a matter of business. Perhaps the judge will use this disclosure for a larger than expected royalty against them. Google's best option now is to settle before the Judge really brings down the hammer. Will they? Probably NOT