InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 320
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/19/2005

Re: steelyeye post# 239150

Saturday, 08/17/2013 10:01:47 AM

Saturday, August 17, 2013 10:01:47 AM

Post# of 312025
I also find it highly interesting that these important questions have been met with silence. That silence speaks volumes, in my view.

I'm glad that people have now figured out who the "puppet master" was.

I appreciate John Wesson blowing the whistle on what was an intolerable situation with "leadership."

While I believe that Sherlock's comments have some merit, as a long-time shareholder, I am not nearly as spun up about the situation. Is it ideal? Of course not. But I doubt that there was much in the way of more attractive financing alternatives available to the company right now. If I am wrong about that, I would like for someone who really knows to spell them out the facts in detail. In addition, my impression is that leadership has taken a decided step up in the vitally important "integrity" category -- and now also has meaningful "skin in the game." I tend to place value in the views of real live shareholders. Others -- not so much.

It will be interesting to learn more about the Nevada federal court suit and who is really behind it. Notice I said who is really behind it. As I think Johnik pointed out earlier on this board, the allegation on behalf of the plaintiff is that a "breach of contract" results in a "federal question" giving rise to jurisdiction in U.S. district court. That demonstrates an utter and complete lack of understanding of federal court jurisdiction and I will leave it at that.