Fair enough I have repeated the question. I did so because i was curious if anyone could name anything that would justify the salary level.One reverse I could understand, but the second to me was because CFO could not use the second CFO to improve the company's situation. as far as what he is paid until company provides better disclosure I can only go by what they claim his salary is.
I have also posted that I believe the faulty,misleading and untimely disclosures , in my opinion , precluded and preclude any serious investor taking this CFO seriously.
But I stand corrected, I wont ask again what justifies this salary.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.