Oh please, I will gladly listen to that story if something could be produced to substantiate the many aspects of geologic information implied.
Otherwise it is a fairy tale as far as I am concerned.
The two are on opposite sides of a north-south fault believed to have shifted structures on the EXS property a kilometer deeper. The Pearl Lake is thought to have mineralization implaced in two separate geologic events in different geologic epochs. The 1 kilometer and above work at those mines was so long ago how could you possibly have had access to drill core logs in order to make the statement you just posted. For that matter where is the drill work that established the actual size of the porphyry on the edge of which EXS has been working? Or where is the geophysical deep penetrating work to establish depth, or geochem radioaging to establish similaar age, etc. ? From what I have seen the TPW work has not been showing similar copper and other byproduct mineralization as exists at Pearl. Finally did you see any gold assays in the long hole in the part of it that actually crossed the porphyry? So why associate the scale of that body that apparently itself does not have mentionable gold content?
Fact D. Come up with some substance to put along with that post and I will gladly listen, maybe even decide to stop believing it a bloated fairy tale.
JMO
PS I will repeat. IMO right now the future of EXS appears to rest on what shows up at East Bay. (i.e. TPW is a dead story as far as the mining industry is concerned at present showings, costs, metals prices)
