Valimed

[lmorovan]

doyourdd, perhaps you might consider telling the truth, for a change. Like, I was never rejected by CDEX for one reason: I never asked CDEX to be on the BOD. I suggested it to the shareholders.

So, there is nothing to be bitter about other than the fact that so far, CDEX has done NOTHING for the ex Loch shareholders. That is, NOTHING. And yes, it has done a LOT for the benefit of insiders and management itself. that is, a LOT.

On the other hand, if I wanted to be on the BOD of CDEX was to help out the shareholders, grossly ignored, abused and lied to by the management, not to help out the company. I have no qualifications in any of the fields CDEX is moving in, but I have morals, ethics and a strong heart for the good of ex Loch shareholders.

Whether you believe it or not it changes not what I feel and want for the long suffering shareholders. You can call me a paid basher or anything you want, you are wrong for the simple reason that you accuse me without any proof. I am open to any agency, bureau, departments or persons to investigate me, my life, my finances, my trading records, my phone, my on line activities, anything. But not anyone of you will ever move a finger to discover the truth, because you all know how embarrassed will you be when all of your accusations are proven wrong and ill willed. Of course, it's easier to throw out false testimony and accusations, it helps you shift the blame for your unfortunate investment, from those who are directly responsible, to me.