You wrote that he doesnt get paid unless he actually produces.
-I do not see in the emploment contract anything that confirms he will only get paid if he produces.
I was referring to his newly filed employment agreement and going forward, which I think is clear, in reference to the $300,000 salary the compay has agreed to.
As far as the past, with all respct you avoid commenting on the key issue - for this "employee" what evidence is there the last 2 years of performance meriting $300,000 per year ?
As to what he has actualy been paid according to the 10q and form 4 filings in the past I cannot figure out what his cash compensation has been. Considering the millions of $ paid according to financial statements for convertible notes ,property and services, it is a stretch to believe CFO not making a decent return on his time ( which I doubt is full time).