It seems obvious that as CFO the SEC would automatically infer he was already in possession of insider info. His ONLY defense from violation is IF it was from a prearranged systematic buying plan that was in force before he was privy to the insider info. If he can't prove that he would be in violation. Get it?
Even if the chances of getting caught are low(which they probably are).
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.