CHARTS_CCI_SYSTEM

[snootmagruder]

mcd, If in fact the council's interpretation was correct, then you would be correct to proclaim Jesus was above weakness or corruptibility as the following quote from Wiki:
"At the end of the creed came a list of anathemas, designed to repudiate explicitly the Arians' stated claims.

1) The view that 'there was once that when he was not' was rejected to maintain the co-eternity of the Son with the Father.
2) The view that he was 'mutable or subject to change' was rejected to maintain that the Son just like the Father was beyond any form of weakness or corruptibility, and most importantly that he could not fall away from absolute moral perfection.