Sure, the court case was made out to be like it was going to be the trial of the century when in actuality it was nothing more than a protective order which was promptly thrown out by the judge.
When you look at all the things that need to be done for this company to become relevant again. This case had nothing to do with any of it. Regardless of any testimony, the reality is this, that beyond the scope of the disagreement between CEO and his friend, the SEC reviewed the documents that everybody here' has been talking about and saw what everybody else sees, it's not real.
So when I say misdirection, I mean it's just something to take your mind off the fact that all the documents, contracts, financials were exposed and that this supposed case gave the CEO an opportunity to try & pull a rabbit out of his hat or when that failed, create his exit strategy at best.
