InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 8449
Next 10
Followers 48
Posts 2221
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/28/2013

Re: coolerheadsprevail post# 1816

Saturday, 08/10/2013 5:17:11 AM

Saturday, August 10, 2013 5:17:11 AM

Post# of 8449
As a frame of reference, from a royalty BASE standpoint, in looking at the estimated royalties reported by Jive and Broadvision, respectively, we can perform a very crude reverse mathematical engineering exercise and interpolate the estimated revenue base that is subject to royalty assessment to be:

~11% for Jive
~18% (at most) for Broadvision

So, clearly, any notions that 100% of any defendant's revenue are "on the table" can be put to bed.

However, that being said, FB and LNKD are clearly a different species vis-a-vis JIVE/BVSN due to both a clearly different business/revenue model coupled with the fact that only FB/LNKD are charged with infringing a fourth patent (241) whereas all other defendants were only charged with infringing the other three patents. As such, it may very well be that the royalty base for FB/LNKD could end up being significantly higher than the 11%/18% we are seeing for JIVE/BVSN...
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent DSS News