Nah, that release from Consumer Affairs reads more like a cheesy crime novel. I, and anyone with any life experience, would tend to believe the founder's version of events in his press release on the subject. The formula is simple, consumer affairs agent is pissed that after a 5 year investigation, the department's "Madoff" candidate was exonerated and let go. The agent responds with a loud press release that fails to mention a disbarred attorney was involved with all of it. Why leave that part out? Why not mention that the alleged acts happened from 2005-2008. The answer is pretty obvious. The agent was looking to harm the founder's credibility and disrupt his current business activities. Surprise, it hasn't worked.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.