InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 502
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/19/2013

Re: mrfence post# 103819

Tuesday, 08/06/2013 4:42:55 PM

Tuesday, August 06, 2013 4:42:55 PM

Post# of 797269
I totally agree mrfence. He deliberately used the words "as we know them" when talking about ending FnF. I get it, having the private sector guarantee loans is fantastic because it does take taxpayers off the hook and brings in private capital. What Obama forgot to mention were the precise mechanisms as to how this would take place. Private capital can't soak up $5 trillion worth of mortgages (or they would have already).

The whole reform debate is ironic to me. Fannie Mae was born out of the Great Depression because interest rates and down payments were ungodly high. The government stepped in so that the middle class could afford to own a home again. The government essentially took loans "off of the books" of private banks, allowing them to free up capital to make more loans and investments. And so the cycle continued until poor lending practices became more common.

Now there's a push to go away from that model. My guess is that as the mortgage-backed securities market is weaned from FnF, private capital won't be able to or willing to keep up with demand (or the public will complain of increasing interest rates and down payments) and then politicians will be arguing for more government intervention in housing.

All in all, big gap down tomorrow and then maybe run after earnings late next week.