InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 3495
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/15/2010

Re: A deleted message

Tuesday, 08/06/2013 3:29:08 PM

Tuesday, August 06, 2013 3:29:08 PM

Post# of 45244
The fact that the name of the corporation was changed and that the model was gradually changed is no indication that it is a different corporation. I sold my ICTN shares after the name was officially changed to BCCI and I suffered a 1-for-20 reverse split. I sold on May 13, 2011, the day before the top due to the coffee bubble. BH thoroughly diluted my shares and those of many others, but luckily I recovered most of my money. I did not get paid .59 based on the old ICTN days, but on the BCCI days.

Barry Henthorn gradually changed the business model to attract new investors, diluted the stockholders and increase the authorized shares after the reverse split. Changing the name was no more than a scheme to help confuse and defraud those who do not know better. After the name change and dilution, Barry Henthorn has taken upon himself to issue nearly one hundred million shares more.

If BCCI is not ICTN, then why did James Hodge of RLTR reissued the 30 million shares claimed by ICTN to BCCI? You do not get to pick the day in which the counting starts. If that is the case, I also get to pick, and I can pick May 14, 2011 when this company was prices as high as 84 cents. But both, your pick and mine would be fraudulent since the company has been in existence since 2000, and all the financial releases provided by the company and found in NASDAQ website clearly point to the truth of my statements.

You do not have to like it, but everyone who comes here can look up the facts independently of any you or I say.