And one last thing Ares.
I just showed you that the SEC suspended them for misleading info, otherwise known as "inaccurate/inadequate".
I also showed you the exact statements in question.
You claim the company never released any misleading statements.
So, unless you can provide this board with the official company response that shows what they said to be accurate and adequate I'd say your argument is baseless and downright worthless.
Because if their statements were accurate ACLH would have made millions using their fancy fluidizer to clean up the gulf but they didn't did they? You see Ares, you don't have to sell stock or trade on the NASDAQ to sell a reliable quality product right? So, even the company was damaged and the share price hurt, the product would still perform, still would have been used and ACLH would have vindicated themselves simply by showcasing what they said it would do to help the cleanup.
Do you see how silly your argument is? You have the SEC openly state what ACLH said that was misleading. You then had ACLH doing nothing from that point forward. So the lack of action, the lack of any of their products being used in the cleanup and the fact that ACLH is a dead abandoned shell pretty much confirms that they were FOS from day one.
Unless you have anything to show me that says otherwise why should I or anybody else listen to you?
And I'm sure you know that the SEC is a civil regulatory body and can't prosecute anybody or send anybody to jail.
