InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 70
Posts 6719
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/04/2010

Re: Bobwins post# 381

Tuesday, 08/06/2013 3:24:14 AM

Tuesday, August 06, 2013 3:24:14 AM

Post# of 464
In the case of resource play wells or even traditional wells that are not explorational, but development in nature, it is prudent to make inferences from choke sizes.

I would caution you against comparing choke settings between exploration wells. There is nothing unorthodox about testing/producing a well on a large choke (or even an open choke) so long as the reservoir is large enough support the production & the Tubing Pressure holds relatively flat. The goal of testing is to find the largest choke size that the reservoir can support.

Without knowing more information, I can only surmise that the reservoir tested in the Cosmo#1 Well is larger than the reservoir tested in the Kenai Loop Well.

--
I am hearing that the AOGCC is convinced that significant reserves are stored in deeper, Jurassic Sediments. that they are hell-bent on testing the Jurassic at the bottom of the Cook Inlet Basin & they are offering some pretty unheard of incentives for operators to drill wells with large surface & intermediate casing so that the wells can latter be used to target deeper formations...

Let me caution you that this is just a rumor, but I have heard that Blue Crest is going to continue drilling the Cosmo#1 down to these Jurassic Sediment. The AGOCC is/has approached other operators regarding such exploration, but they seem to think that the Cosmo Structure is the best place to drill such a well... & why not do it while the rig is on location? If I get more information, I will share it, but as for now it is just a rumor...

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.