InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,344.16
(
0.47%
)
US TECH 100
18,024.00
(
0.56%
)
Dow Jones
39,497.54
(
0.13%
)
Brent Oil
79.49
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,983.37
(
0.17%
)
Post# of 488523
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

F6

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 59
Posts 34538
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 01/02/2003

F6

Re: fuagf post# 207340

Monday, 08/05/2013 3:03:46 AM

Monday, August 05, 2013 3:03:46 AM

Post# of 488523
fuagf -- to have a chance of effectively shutting off the groundwater leakage they would have to isolate the plant from the groundwater flow on the upstream side, above the plant on the opposite side from the shore, and lay in a floor underneath extending to the shore, and wall off the sea -- given what's obvious from all the stories about a very considerable groundwater flow/system there, only a complete tub containing the entire primarily-contaminated site (considerably beyond just the reactors and related structures) could actually be effective


Greensburg, KS - 5/4/07

"Eternal vigilance is the price of Liberty."
from John Philpot Curran, Speech
upon the Right of Election, 1790

F6

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up