InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 203
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/07/2012

Re: tradeQ post# 39860

Sunday, 08/04/2013 7:02:27 PM

Sunday, August 04, 2013 7:02:27 PM

Post# of 68424
So, just so I understand the logic in your two's argument.

The judge is simply asking GOOG to provide the additional revenues from 10/1 a 11/20 so that VRNG can use the already confirmed royalty base on GOOG numbers and present them to the court.

Question, why doesn't the judge just have GOOG supply the revenues to the court and the judge perform the simple arithmetic?

Secondly, what exactly then is GOOG responding to?