Saturday, August 03, 2013 4:02:44 PM
Certainly hope that your reasoning is the reasoning that HJMJ accepts. It seems totally logical to me and I agree with you. But unfortunately, I'm not HJMJ! lol
I think the odds are high he would rule as you suggest considering there are no trial based facts to support the jury's damages award, but..... I WOULD wager high odds that after VRNG calculates their damages off of GOOG's data, that GOOG, will counterargue using the jury's award as the base..... And, unfortunately, I'm no longer going to be surprised if HJMJ's molasses becomes thicker than it already is, and he doesn't provide an ongoing RR until the same time he rules on pre-judgement and post-judgment interest and damages.... We'll see what Monday brings... Why can't this puppy bark clearly?? lol
ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) Launchs IQ Nano Drone for Commercial Indoor Use • HALO • Oct 10, 2024 8:09 AM
CBD Life Sciences Inc. (CBDL) Targets Alibaba as the Next Retail Giant for Wholesale Expansion of Top-Selling CBD Products • CBDL • Oct 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Foremost Lithium Announces Option Agreement with Denison on 10 Uranium Projects Spanning over 330,000 Acres in the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan • FAT • Oct 10, 2024 5:51 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Reports Significant Progress in Community Relations and Development Efforts in Chachas, Peru • ELEM • Oct 9, 2024 10:30 AM
Unitronix Corp Launches Share Buyback Initiative • UTRX • Oct 9, 2024 9:10 AM
BASANITE INDUSTRIES, LLC RECEIVES U.S. PATENT FOR ITS BASAFLEX™ BASALT FIBER COMPOSITE REBAR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING • BASA • Oct 9, 2024 7:30 AM