XpresSpa Group Inc (XSPA)

[arper]

IBH, I don't think you are correct. Judge ruled on the MOTION in favor of VRNG. He did NOT rule on the proposed remedy submitted by VRNG. His ruling in favor of VRNG specifically mentions "rate to be determined" and the 20.9% is not mentioned (nor is 3.5%). Others more familiar than I with this can weigh in, but I've seen this confusion before a few months ago where posters were confusing PROPOSED orders, unsigned by HJMJ with the actual ruling. I know you're trying to help, and I wish you were correct, but I don't believe you are on this point.

arp